Comparison
A Conveyor alternative that leaves the box empty
A questionnaire and customer-trust product, and the closest thing to a direct competitor this tool has. Not a compliance platform with a questionnaire feature bolted on: security questionnaires, RFPs, a Trust Center, knowledge management and analytics, built for a team whose job is customer security reviews.
How Conveyor does it
Taken from their own page, 2026-09-03.
- A knowledge library is built by syncing external drives, company wikis, support sites, documents and past questionnaires.
- Answers are generated from that library, and the page says every response is cited back to source docs, and grounded in your approved knowledge base rather than guesses or stale copy-paste.
- Review is by exception: the page says Conveyor auto-tags reviewers, scores answer confidence and flags outdated data, so you review the exceptions rather than every answer.
- Questionnaires are accepted in any format, and a browser extension auto-completes portal-based questionnaires in one click.
- The page claims 95% AI accuracy out of the box and that it can automate 90% of security questionnaires, and cites a customer going from four minutes per question to twenty-two seconds.
What Conveyor is better at
Written because it is true. If any of these is what you need, buy theirs. You will be happier and we would rather you were.
- Portals. A browser extension that auto-completes a portal questionnaire solves a genuinely hard problem, and a large share of questionnaires never arrive as a file at all.
- Building the knowledge base for you. Syncing wikis, drives and support sites means the library assembles itself, where this tool answers from documents you upload deliberately.
- Being a whole workflow for a team. Reviewer routing, confidence scoring, staleness flags and analytics are what a security review function needs, and are not what this is.
- Breadth. RFPs and a Trust Center in the same product, from an established vendor with people whose job is to answer you.
The difference that matters
Conveyor is built to fill the sheet and have you check the exceptions. This is built around the questions your documents do not answer. When nothing in your evidence supports a response, it writes nothing in the cell and names the document you would need, rather than producing a cited, confident-looking answer for you to approve. Those are different bets about where the risk sits. Conveyor's is that reviewing exceptions is cheaper than writing answers, which for a team doing this every week is very likely true. This one's is that the expensive mistake is a plausible answer nobody checked, because a wrong answer in a returned questionnaire is a written claim about your security posture that outlives the deal.
Choose Conveyor if
- Your questionnaires arrive through customer portals rather than as files.
- Somebody's job is security reviews, and they need routing, confidence scoring and reporting around the work.
- You want RFPs and a Trust Center from the same vendor.
- Your knowledge already lives across wikis, drives and past questionnaires and you want it pulled in automatically.
Choose FillTrust if
- You would rather hand back a sheet with gaps you can see than one that is full and unverified.
- You meet questionnaires occasionally and have no security review function to build a workflow around.
- You want the passage behind every answer in the sheet itself, so a reviewer can check it without opening a document.
- You want to pay for one questionnaire when you have one questionnaire.
See it decline to answer
The demo runs the same questionnaire against three companies with very different documentation. One answers eight of eight. One answers two. That spread is the whole argument, and no account is needed to look at it.
Open the demoEverything stated here about Conveyor was read from conveyor.com/products/security-questionnaire-automation and conveyor.com on 2026-09-03 and is described in their words rather than characterised in ours. No pricing is quoted, because it changes and being wrong about somebody else’s price is the worst way to be wrong. If something here has gone out of date, tell us and it will be corrected.